Unpopular opinion: I think we rely too much on the software to do the thinking for us
Last week, I was checking a set of shop drawings from a junior drafter for a steel frame in a Denver warehouse. The 3D model looked perfect, but when I printed the plans to scale, I saw a major clash between a beam and a duct run that the clash detection just missed. It was right there on paper. Three years ago, before everything went fully digital, I would have caught that in the first review because we had to think about the space, not just trust the green checkmark. Now I make my team do a full paper check on every big job before it goes out. It adds maybe half a day, but it saves a ton of site headaches. Has anyone else had a close call like that where the software said it was fine but it really wasn't?